Find and follow us
Get our most popular stories once a week!
September 7, 2009
UPDATED: Van Jones Resignation: A Setback for Young Organizers
UPDATE: A few youth organizers sent in their reactions to the sudden resignation of Van Jones and we wanted to share them with our readers:
Awais Khaleel, Policy Director, The Roosevelt Institute
The Roosevelt Institute has had a long history of working with Van Jones, and we hope to continue to build that working relationship.
Through meaningful policy discussions on local initiatives and national issues, Van Jones blazed an innovative path by engaging with and empowering young people, communities of color, and others groups that are still too often shut out from this process. During the spring of 2009, the Michigan State University chapter of the Roosevelt Institute worked closely with the office of Mr. Jones in forming a coalition of student environmentalists entitled Code Green. This effort afforded young progressive activists an unprecedented level of access to the green initiatives of this administration.
This past summer, Van. Jones spoke at the Summit for the 80 Million Strong for Young American Jobs, a coalition on which the Roosevelt Institute proudly co-chairs. He delivered an inspirational speech on the cross-sections of the obligation to our planet, obligation to our youth, and obligation to one's own entrepreneurial passions. We remain extraordinarily grateful for Mr. Jones' continued dedication to the Roosevelt Institute Campus Network and the 80 Million Strong campaign.
We thank Van Jones for his service to this nation. While we are saddened by his departure from the White House, we are confident that Mr. Jones will continue to be a progressive green leader and policy agenda-setter, and stand by him in his coming endeavors.
Tiffiniy Cheng, A New Way Forward
I will be a while before we really see the effects of Van Jones stepping down. But, this kind of political infighting has the immediate ripple effect of making those already unengaged that much more happy they aren't a part of the political process. Shame on the corporate interests and their supporters for making an honest debate impossible.
*********************
Van Jones, the long-time environmental and racial justice advocate resigned from his position as the "Green Jobs" Czar and White House environmental adviser late on Saturday. Many progressives are disappointed with the Obama administration for bowing to conservative criticism of Jones' controversial past comments and actions. (See more reactions: Vibe.com, San Francisco Chronicle and The Nation.)
The news is viewed as a serious set-back among many young progressives, especially young people from low-income or working-class communities who have been advocating for green jobs in the past few years.
For young activists, Jones was the fiercest and most visible preacher of sustainable environment and green jobs. Youth organizer Juan Reynosa, who worked with young people in Albuquerque and in his native rural town of Hobbs, New Mexico, said in December that Jones' message provided proactive solutions that resonated with young people -- such as retrofitting old, polluting buildings, putting on biodiesel-powered concerts and pushing their cities to support green jobs programs.
Pittsburgh native Chester Thrower III was inspired by Jones' idea of self-sufficiency and entrepreneurship. Jones told Thrower that he could be an entrepreneur, that he could run his own business someday. Thrower -- who could think of only four people who owned small businesses in the Manchester neighborhood of Pittsburgh where he grew up -- was inspired, he said in February.
Nationally, there are about 1.7 million low-income youths (aged 16 to 24) who were out of school and out of work in 2005. This group is also the most likely not to have any health insurance. Jones -- the first African-American to write a best-selling environmental book -- helped inspire these hard-to-reach communities. It's hard to think of another individual on the Hill who spent as much time talking and listening to disenfranchised youth.
In late February, more than 10,000 young environmental activists came to D.C. to demand a sustainable energy bill and green jobs. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- the government's plan to rescue the economy -- included more than $60 billion in clean energy investments. Over $500 million of that is allocated to green jobs training initiatives. Jones was helping make sure that these resources reach the neediest communities and his absence leaves a gaping hole for the administration to fill.
Kristina Rizga is the executive editor of WireTap, project director of Future5000.com, and a writer and an editorial board member of The Nation magazine.
Recent posts by Kristina Rizga
Blog Roll
- Low End Theory
- Youth Outlook
- Think Progress
- RaceWire
- FoBBDeep
- Campus Progress
- Feministing
- Sepia Mutiny
- Racialicious
- Of America
- Young People For
- Future Majority
- New America Media
- Adriel Luis
- Blackademics
- Jeff Chang at Zentronix
- The Nation
- Oh Dang! Magazine
- Campus Camp Wellstone
- Feminist Review
- Mother Jones Blog
- Brownfemipower
- DMI Blog
- POOR Magazine
- Conscious Youth Media Crew
- Doorknockers
- Citizen Orange
- Square Rootz
- Guerilla Mama Medicine
- Edutopia
- Domingo Yu
- Cool Cat Teacher
- 2 Cents Worth Education
- 38th Notes
- Quirky Black Girls
- United States of Jamerica
- Womanist Musings
- Kameelah Writes
- Working In These Times
- Model Minority
- Guerilla Busfare
- 99 problems
- The Sanctuary
- Youth Communication
- Post Pomo Nuyorican Homo
- Unapologetic Mexican
- Transformative Media Justice
- EthnoBlog
- Black Youth Project

The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone that participated.
Report this commentGood Bye Van - Hello 2 thousands 2 follow
Posted by: nedhamson on Sep 7, 2009 4:09 PM
Yes, it is too bad that Van Jones resigned but a set back to young activists? Why? What he would agree to is that failure is not in getting knocked down, it is in not getting up. If you feel that this is a blow to you, grow with it and grow stronger.The key is this - if you give up, there is no guarantee that someone with your dreams and possibility will take you place.
There's no guarantee that you will succeed - for sure. But if you don't play, there is a guarantee the chances of success are less for all of us!
Are we actually better off with an unfettered Van Jones?
Posted by: geoffreydobbins on Sep 10, 2009 7:27 AM
I agree with Kristina Rizga. Van Jones was an incredible loss for the administration. He's a brilliant and inspiring figure.But I'm imagining Jones laughing to himself somewhere and saying "You can't win Darth. If you strike me down I'll become more powerful than you could ever imagine."
I say this because I also sort of agree with Arianna Huffington's response to the situation. Huffington says, "If Glenn Beck had any sense at all, he would have done everything in his power to keep Van Jones right where he was." Brentin Mock at The Root.com says something similar. Now that he's unfettered by the demands of being part of the Washington political machine, Jones may actually be able to do more good.
When I first saw Jones on Tavis Smiley, I deeply admired him right away. So much so that I couldn't imagine him working in Washington. Even Obama's Washington (which still seemed like a long shot then).
When he resigned it sent my mind back to a Yes! Magazine article I read about Jones a while back. Soon after the election Yes! asked him if he wanted to be part of the Obama administration. He laughed and said "No." He couldn't imagine it happening. At the time he seemed to doubt he could do more in Washington than he was already doing outside of government. He even referenced the example of South Africa as a warning. He said the victory of Nelson Mandela actually led to an unforeseen vacuum of street activists because so many joined Mandela in government.
So maybe Huffington is right. Maybe Jones is more needed and more effective doing community work.
But it's still a terrible blow. What concerns me most is the sort of associations that triggered successful attacks against Jones. With the exception of the Truther movement, his history seems - at least to me - like what you'd naturally expect to see in any progressive activist's past. In many cases, Beck smeared Jones by associating him with what are actually admirable activities and organizations.
Apparently a lot of people are frightened by positive, bridge-building groups like SEIU, the Sierra Club and Green For All. I can't say I'm surprised. But I'm still saddened that so many great activists doing great work (including people I know personally) could be vilified so easily.