Get our most popular stories once a week!
The Republicans are getting out their spears and rattles and chanting around the party fire again..."
Posted by olympicrange in Who is Bill Ayers?
hungryaardvark posted in Who is Bill Ayers?
vitablue posted in From Slingshots to Solutions: Goals for Organizers
rl122176@yahoo.com posted in Who is Bill Ayers?
|
Hip-Hop Elitism: Why Soulja Boy is More Hip Hop Than You
(This originally appeared on Chinaka Hodge’s blog Thickwitness.)
A few months ago my group iLL-Literacy performed at the Trinity International Hip Hop Festival in Hartford, CT. Although many of the folks we met during the festival were really dope, down to earth people, there was also a frighteningly large presence of people that you'd expect to see at something called an "international hip hop festival." You know, the knit caps, the worn-out hoodies, and the noses staunchly pointed upward at anything that doesn't fit into the mold of hump-Atmosphere-on-the-leg real hip-hop. As a result, we found ourselves dodging Hiero vs. Pharcyde debates and roaming through venues that spun A Tribe Called Quest and EPMD songs all day long, just to retreat to our hotel room, crack open some forties and unapologetically pump Lil Wayne into the weezy hours of the morning.
However, it wasn't until we sat down for our interview that people started looking at us like the ugly ducklings of the day. It was at this moment that we were asked the fateful question that must be asked at all such hip-hop events: "How do you feel about how mainstream rappers like Soulja Boy are tarnishing real hip-hop?" Our response might or might not have been something that could be chiseled down to "Soulja Boy is real hip-hop, son!" Whatever it was that we actually said, we left many a jaw gaped open and I'm sure that rappers from at least three countries have it somewhere in their heads to email us a diss track soon. Regardless, as someone who once regularly wore a headwrap and memorized The Roots' Things Fall Apart, I'd like to state my case for all the Soulja Boys out there:

There's something so incredibly perverse about 30-year-old white suburbans assuming the role of Hip-Hop Fairy, dashing their microphone-shaped wands at black youth and delineating that they're not speaking from the voice of real hip-hop. Can one of you hip-hop purists please tell me, how many Sage Francis albums do you have to memorize before you get to reach "hip-hop enlightenment" and start seeing the real/fake hip-hop binary like Neo? As you stand outside your local divebar's open mic nite and declare with angst that you're going to "take things back to hip-hop's foundation," I'd like to point out that when the Get Fresh Crew first started cyphering in the Bronx, the last thing they were thinking about was your leprechaun ass. If hip-hop is dying, it's more than likely that your 1993-jocking emo rap is only making its death more annoyingly painful.
Anyway, back to Soulja Boy. Yes, his rhyme scheme is basic. And yes, the implications of "Crank That" are pretty vulgar--as were the "I'm gonna rip off your epidermis and feed it to your mother" battle rhymes of underground legends like Canibus, Jedi Mind Tricks, and early Eminem. But just not liking someone or not thinking someone is skilled or constructive isn't really a basis to decide that it's not real. In fact, basing validity on skill is pretty elitist of you, and despite what you might claim on Track 3 on your demo, you did not bust out of your mom's womb ripping mics. Like all other art forms, hip-hop should be allowed the freedom and versatility to include the good (Dilla, some would argue), the bad (Soulja Boy, some would argue), and the ugly (Jermaine Dupri, everyone agrees).

Next, have you forgotten that Soulja Boy is probably younger than your grimy ass Walk This Way t-shirt? The guy is 17 and is probably doing more artistically at his age than you were, working at the mall serving Icees in the name of hip-hop. To judge the validity of any artist based on their first record, not to mention first single, ignores the growth and depth that are instrumental in the foundation of hall-of-famers like Tupac, OutKast, and Jay-Z. Now I'm definitely not saying that souljaboytellem.com (yes that's the album name) is equivalent to Reasonable Doubt, but when it comes to "upliftment" one has to question if gaining momentum through a raunchy online video is really that much more detrimental to society than moving to Virginia to sell enough crack to start a record label. And lets not forget about Mr. Weezy F. Baby b.k.a. Lil Wayne, who many continue to dismiss based on their perception of him as the teenaged King of Bling. Ten years later, while the purists have had their heads up the Grouch's ass all this time, Weezy has put New Orleans back on the music map, been featured on your favorite rapper's latest album, and is blueballing the world with the most highly anticipated music album of the day. Lick on that lollipop, suckers.
So when it comes to understanding what real hip-hop encompasses, it's inescapable to consider the foundation of it being about turning nothing into something. In the way that cats in the late 70s took their parents' records, wrote rhymes over them, and turned that concept into a worldwide phenomenon. Or in the way that NWA understood that the media virtually ignored life in the ghetto, and used rap to bring their point of view into popular consciousness. And yes, even in the way that a 17-year-old from Mississippi posted a YouTube video one day, gained enough momentum to independently release a record, and ended up topping the Billboard charts and getting a Grammy nomination. Ultimately, Soulja Boy did exactly what you've been trying to do in your mom's basement since you were 14. Don't get your cargo shorts in a bunch just because you've been competing at Scribble Jam for the past three years and still don't have any Myspace friends.

Speaking of foundation, the state of hip-hop is best demonstrated by what urban youth of color find relevant, not what backpackers from Walnut Creek are nodding their beanie hats to. For better or worse, Soulja Boy is globally appearing on kids' iPods more frequently than, say, Brother Ali. Regardless of what you think of Soulja Boy's message, it speaks to the youth that hip-hop has sought to speak to since it was first born. If the youth are in a position where the songs that they can relate to depict "supersoaking hos," there's a much larger issue at hand than just the song or the artist that composed it. If you feel like Soulja Boy isn't real hip-hop because of his graphic and negative songs, find a way to educate the kid or at least the kids that are bumping his shit. But plugging your ears and saying "Well that's not real hip-hop"...that would be like living in a neighborhood and seeing some kids from down the block stealing an old lady's purse and being like "Oh that's not very positive...those must not be real neighbors." Simply pushing it all outside of your consciousness, deeming it irrelevant, or disowning it from your utopian and fluffy concept of reality won't solve anything. Instead, it will continue to alienate the voices and preferences of oppressed youth, and toss hip-hop into the cesspool of musical genres that have become dominated by flannel-wearing goose hunters from Providence.

We have found ourselves in a Twilight Zone of a situation in which hip-hop--a music form whose history has been paved with the struggle of being validated as "real music"--is now experiencing a micro version of its own peril, in the form of the internal strife over which part of itself can be validated as "real hip-hop." Hip-hop is deeply rooted in opposing the elitism that barred it from shelves in record stores, stages in music halls, and definitely the uppity approval of music intellectuals. In fact, in this whole scheme of things, it seems that the only thing that is truly, defiantly not hip-hop, is to claim to have the phantom certification to say what is and isn't.
We can only wait and see what happens with Soulja Boy, Hurricane Chris, Shawty-Lo, and all the other rappers du jour. Maybe like most others, they'll fade away after the first couple of singles. Or maybe they're reinvent themselves like the gun-toting diamond-studded pre-Food & Liquor Lupe Fiasco did. Regardless, it's evident that whether or not you like these rappers there something to be said about the fact that a large portion of our youth gravitate towards them as the the spokespeople of their generation.
So the next time you hear music from someone, particularly a young person of color who is obviously rapping, and who has obviously captured the attention of urban youth--and still somehow find in yourself the audacity to preside over why it is or isn't hip-hop, as yourself: "Am I exhibiting the elitist attitude that has been the primary plague of hip-hop culture and its participants for all these decades?" The answer is most likely: "Yahh, trick, yahh!"
Adriel Luis is a Bay Area native and a lover of all things weird. In 2002 he founded iLL-Literacy, a four-person spoken word collective that has since toured worldwide and received high acclaim in the spoken word, music, and theater scenes alike. In 2005 the video for his poem "Slip of the Tongue" received an EMMY Award and was featured in over 75 film festivals throughout the world. His new music project, Pretty Buoyant Society, is set to debut in the summer of 2008. He also blogs at Adrizzle.


i thought hip hop, by definition, was supposed to be empowering...
Posted by: jodijodijodi on Jun 25, 2008 8:40 AM
...artisitically, creatively and emotionally. The way I see it, talking about 'supersoaking hos' isn't hip hop, it's capitalizing on sex and sexism. That's not the hip hop I believe in, that's just mainstream top 40 capitalism.Hip hop is a social tool and it is a musical genre.
Posted by: oneofmany on Jun 27, 2008 2:21 PM
But there's a difference between hip-hop as a social tool and a musical genre.I suppose these elitists say 'real' hip hop is both. And the same people say that 'fake' hip hop is just the second. Well....
Hip-hop at its roots, I would say, was not what it is now. 'Back in the day' hip hop as a social tool: required creative technique, talent and subject matter. This does not mean 'wack MC's' did not exist back then, they just couldnt get very far. Now. When people start making money out of a particular style of musical delivery, things change, its becomes a business. 'Hip pop' is the way kids.
Like every market in the corporate world, I believe that hip-hop - as a musical genre - includes people like Soulja boy. But that doesn't make it right, it doesn't speak well of our times, but - it's true.
It's similar to other genre changes - how the indie genre has to put up with Maroon 5 and the dance genre for some reason contains Goldfrapp... But very different in the sense that hip hop - as a social tool - is distorted - by people like Soulja boy. He has (from my personal perspective) single-handedly dumbed down the minds of little boys and girls I see around me, that recite his lyrics endlessly. Now I know that selling sex is nothing new to the pop industry, but the effects of 'Crank Dat' are not just musical, they are social and they do reflect ideas towards certain ethnicities. Every rap has a story and every story has a message.
What I'm saying here is that elitists target 'Crank Dat' not just because their anal musical collectors with no lives, I don't dispute that. But they also criticise it because songs like this have negative side-effects, even if we're not going to hear of this boy in a years time...
interesting piece, but several holes.
Posted by: jamesdunn on Jul 6, 2008 8:24 PM
I think the general point of this story needed to be made, so i'm glad you did it. The vast majority of contemporary underground rap I don't listen to, because I don't see a point in listening to rehashes of the '90s classics when I can listen to the records they're trying to emulate. And keep in mind, I'm a '90s hip-hop head all the way. Moreover, hate is a pointless exercise. There are few things I find more boring in music than complaining-ass rappers. So I thank you for putting that out there.But being a true-blue hip-hop head who was in high school in the early '90s and has given his life to hip-hop in every way you can imagine, I'd just like to remind you and everyone of one of hip-hop's traditions: attack the wack. Hip-hop has always had its own way of quality control - the wack get pointed out, and if we're lucky, weeded out by rappers more skilled than them. Skill most definitely relates to validity in hip-hop. Always has, and hopefully always will.
Now mind you, this really only works if the person doing the dissing actually has more skill than his target. But the underground rap genre and the southern rap genre are so different, it's like apples vs. oranges. There is very little common ground on which to compare them.
So in conclusion, is Soulja Boy hip-hop? Most definitely. But is Soulja Boy wack? Most definitely. Faddy, one-hit wonder, fast-food slaptrap rap to be chewed up and spit out at the speed of light. And I hope there will always be hip-hop artists and fans to point the Soulja Boys out. That's hip-hop. I also hope that the emcees doing the pointing will one day be dope enough to eclipse the Soulja Boys of the world themselves. But even if they don't, they will always be hip-hop as well. Even if they are '93-jocking emo-rap or flannel-wearing goose hunters from Providence.