Find and follow us
Get our most popular stories once a week!
Get the Widget
All Stories WireTap

No Gardasil, No Papers: Immigrant Women and the HPV Vaccine

 
gardasil1

Op-Ed: A new mandate requiring all female immigrants to receive an expensive new vaccine raises questions.


"Choice" is the marketing theme for Gardasil, a vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). For women who are American citizens, Gardasil is a choice; for women who are immigrants, the vaccine is a federal mandate upon which their presence in this country depends.

As of July 2008, female immigrants between the ages of 11 and 26 who seek to adjust their citizenship status are required to receive the vaccine. Gardasil markets itself as part of a sexual health revolution for empowered, educated young women and girls -- from their promotional TV spot, "I Chose," to their website which boasts, "We chose to help protect ourselves…. Now the choice is yours!"

But the message that the vaccine is a way for all young women to protect themselves and make decisions about their own sexual health is partial and false; for immigrant women, the vaccine represents the policing of their bodies.

The mandate is a disturbing marriage between anti-immigrant policy and the capitalist ambitions of pharmaceutical giant, Merck, which produces the vaccine. Merck will be cashing checks every time an immigrant woman or girl seeks citizenship in the United States.

Moreover, enforced vaccination is yet another federal measure to police the bodies of immigrant women. These are women who are already subject to deportation, detention, militaristic border control, raids and other brutal enforcement tactics. Now, sexual health regulations require female immigrants to exchange their freedom to make decisions about their own bodies for American citizenship status.

Unaffordable Alternatives

Priced at nearly $360 for all three doses, it is unlikely that many immigrant women and girls will be able to bear the financial hardship of the vaccine and complete the series. Even in the short-term, the requirement of Gardasil does not sufficiently protect immigrant women and girls from HPV and cervical cancer. In order to be effective, Gardasil must be given as three injections over the course of six months. As the makers of the vaccine advertise, "3 IS KEY." Yet the I-693 "Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record" requires that immigrant females receive only the first dose "to be medically cleared for adjustment of status."

For immigrant women and girls with limited access to health care and health education, the potential benefits of Gardasil do not even begin to comprehensively address their sexual health needs. It is important for all women to have regular Pap smears in order to detect cervical cancer. Vaccination does not replace this important test. In this country, women of color and low-income women suffer disproportionately from cervical cancer due to a lack of access to health care and these vital tests. Long after vaccination, immigrant women will experience barriers to quality health care due to their gender, status, class, race and language, which will make these regular screenings a challenge.

The requirement of only one dose, the high cost of the vaccine and the absence of any effort to address larger reproductive and sexual health issues of female immigrants raises the question: What is the benefit of the Gardasil mandate for immigrant women and girls? The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) requirement is not a beneficent policy with the health and rights of immigrant women and girls as its core objective. In fact, Gardasil is still a controversial vaccine -- there have been thousands of cases of adverse effects and approximately (PDF) twenty deaths associated with the vaccine. The subjection of an entire generation of immigrant female youth to the vaccine may have alarming public health implications, coinciding as it does with long-standing American anxieties about foreigners and disease, as well as a racist and sexist tradition of using vulnerable female populations of color as test subjects.

Holding the State Accountable

The Gardasil mandate is now being enforced as President Obama launches the Council on Women and Girls, a special White House task force implemented to ensure that federal agencies assess the impact of their policies on women and families. If the new administration is committed to the well-being of women and girls, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and USCIS must be held accountable.

These government agencies must consider the cost of the HPV vaccine requirement to immigrant females -- not only in terms of price and potential health risks, but also in terms of reproductive justice and self-determination. Overturning this mandate is urgent if the new administration is committed not only to the issues that affect primarily privileged women, such as "hitting a glass ceiling," but also to the issues that affect those on the margins of society -- poor, queer, minority, young and immigrant women.

The choice that women celebrate on Gardasil's website is a myth so long as some women are not free to decide whether the vaccine is right for them. Vaccines are meant to improve the health of individuals and communities; they should not be tools of a patriarchal and capitalist system that disempower women and profit from the regulation of their bodies. In order to be well, immigrant women need more than a series of injections. Rather, they need a demilitarized immigration system that respects the autonomy of all women and girls to make choices about their bodies -- from their movement across national borders to their reproductive rights.

Naima Coster is a writer and organizer from Brooklyn, New York. She is a graduate of Yale College where she studied English, African American Studies and fiction writing. She works with young people in the South Bronx to raise awareness about immigrant rights through the creative arts.

 
Login Signup
View
Comments closed.

The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone that participated.

Report this comment

on point!

Posted by: jjcolombian on Apr 22, 2009 9:00 AM

this policy comes from America's own racism, sexism, and corporate greed. Ms. Coster is on point!
 
Report this comment

Good for women = good for men

Posted by: Baka Karasu on Apr 24, 2009 3:50 PM

The unspoken assumption here is that only women need (or not) to get the Gardasil vaccine. Since the vaccine prevents a sexually transmitted disease, men should get it to the same degree (and via the same rationales) as women.
 
Report this comment

This is just the usual Big Pharma profiteering

Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Apr 25, 2009 11:25 AM

As usual, they go after the most helpless first, and do all they can to make it mandatory. Fluoride in the water was the greatest profiteering victory ever, and it remains the Holy Grail for industry. They tried it with this vaccine too, and failed, as they tried it with the statin drugs. This time makes even less sense than usual (save as another blockage to legal immigration that will keep the influx of cash to private prisons flowing uninterrupted) though: even they admit that less than the full series does no good, and these women can't afford the expense. It's an outrageous, in the open attempt to require something useless of these women that they can't complete and may well cause them other than financial harm simply to keep them from being here legally. It has no other purpose as far as I can see.

Ian
 
Report this comment

Good point but unevenly presented

Posted by: zelda on Apr 26, 2009 11:02 PM

I'm not sure this article is representative of existing research - or lack thereof - on Gardasil. I agree that forcing immigrant women to obtain it will not necessarily achieve the desired health effects and that such policies may be detrimental already underserved groups. But the author's data does not match the CDC's or that of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (run by CDC). The author seems to be getting at a Merck/government conspiracy theory and whereas it is important to question any policy that will financially benefit big pharma and politicians, she selectively cites research that suits her thesis. An article questioning the vaccine's effectiveness and the potential for certain government policies to fail women can certainly be legit but not without acknowledging that Gardasil research thus far has not been uniform in its findings.

Thirty-two women who received the vaccine died shortly thereafter out of the 23 million who received it in total (through 2008). However, the CDC states, "There was no common pattern to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine."

Clearly the problem requires much more research and immigrant women should not be used as guinea pigs for testing national health policies. But journalism that does not acknowledge controversies or inconsistencies in research seems irresponsible and possibly alarmist.
 
Report this comment

radio program on this requirement

Posted by: elenabl on Apr 27, 2009 11:07 AM

I've actually just produced a radio program on this same topic called "Guard Us All? Immigrant Women and the HPV Vaccine." The piece looks at the requirement for immigrant women to get the HPV vaccination, Gardasil, and histories of reproductive oppression against immigrant women and women of color. It's online at:
The National Radio Project's website

I also know that due to pressure from reproductive justice and immigrants rights organizations around the country, the CDC has created a workgroup to address concerns around this vaccination requirement. This workgroup is currently taking public comments too!
 
Report this comment

DRap

Posted by: DRap on May 11, 2009 9:31 AM

I've always been skeptical about this drug. Very strange how this thing came out of nowhere with such an aggressive marketing campaign. Cervical cancer is not as common as purported; why all this fuss over it? Why is it only "effective" during optimal childbearing years, which really doesn't have anything significant to do with cervical health? What is this drug going to do to the reproductive system? Are we going to have an upswing in infertility? I hate the commercials, they're so disturbing in their sheepleness. Young girls "choose" this product (although they can't choose anything else in their lives legally) while having their hair brushed by their mothers; it's so coercive, it's creepy.
 
Report this comment

imminent vaccination against my will

Posted by: laceygray on May 13, 2009 12:06 AM

hi

Very interesting read . I am currently going through the immigration process. I am 25 years old from the UK and have just married the man of my dreams, he happens to reside here in LA so i am having to go through blood tests, invasive questioning and such like to enable me to live happily with him. Not only is it proving stressful and costly but i have now been advised that i need to have an HPV vaccine in order for my other medical paperwork to be processed which i find utterly inhumane. I do NOT feel comfortable being forced into undergoing a vaccination that is relatively new to the market and that i am not personally ready to go through. In addition it is costly and to be quite honest i wonder whether this is simply a money-maker for the government and its associated pharmaceutical companies. I feel extremely passionate about the fact that this so called CHOICE is taken out of my hands. IF there were to be any negative side-effects who would be left to deal with the situation? Not the Government, Not the Pharmaceuticals but me, newly married trying to have a happy, healthy life. This mandate is absolutely absurd and i feel is a disgusting injustice to human beings in a so-called democracy. What's a girl to do? Relinquish her human right to freedom of choice of personal development and self preservation OR relinquish the opportunity to live happily ever after with her new hubby? I'm sure you'd agree the 'choice' has been made for me, regardless...Thanks, Guardasil :-(
 
 
 

 
More stories by